Today's Headlines: Trump and Taxes, Part 2

Economic News you can Use

Today's Headlines: Trump and Taxes, Part 2
February 7, 2017

Keep It Simple

Last week we considered how President Trump's and the House of Representatives' corporate tax policy could indirectly affect your personal taxes. This week, we consider the direct effect of individual income tax policy.

The theme is simplification, but the approaches are different. Trump's plan compresses tax brackets but does not simplify many other aspects. The House plan truly is simplification, to the point where many taxpayers' forms could fit on a standard postcard.

Tax Brackets

Trump would simplify tax rates from the current seven brackets to three brackets: 12%, 25%, and 33%. The threshold values would be $75,000 (25%) and $112,500 (33%) for single taxpayers, and twice that for married filing jointly (MFJ).

Winners and losers are spread throughout the bracket because of the difference in Trump's threshold values and current law. The higher 33% bracket would apply to more people, increasing taxes for singles making between $112,500 and $191,650 but providing a significant break for those making above $416,700. Trump also intends to repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) that limits tax benefits for higher earners.

At the other end of the scale, singles making $9,325 or less will see their bracket increase, while those earning between $9,325 and $75,000 will see a tax cut — especially those between $37,950 and $75,000 who will see their rate drop from 25% to 12%.

With respect to rates, the House agrees with Trump's rates of 12%, 25% and 33%, but the thresholds for the 25% rate and 33% rate are left as is. Only the current 10% bracket will be adversely affected.


Under Trump's plan, itemized deductions would be capped at $100,000 for singles, $200,000 for married filing jointly. It's not clear if all deductions would survive and be subject to that limitation, or if exceptions will exist.

For those choosing the standard deduction, it's a good news/bad news situation. Trump would greatly increase the standard deduction from the current $6,300 single/$12,600 MFJ to $15,000 single/$30,000 MFJ, but would eliminate all personal exemptions (currently $4,050). Lower income, single parents may struggle, especially those with more than one child, and Trump's proposed child-care credit and Dependent Care Savings Account (analogous to a Health Savings Account, or HSA) are unlikely to bridge the gap.

The House eliminates most itemized deductions but retains mortgage interest and charitable contributions. Those would become "above the line" deductions that subtract directly from taxable income. The House plan would also retain contributions to certain savings plans as an above-the-line deduction.

Conversely, there are three tax credits in the House plan that can subtract directly from your tax bill: a child credit, earned income credit (EITC), and higher education credit. The EITC and child credit ($1,500 per child) blunt the effect of a higher tax rate on low-income Americans.

Investments And Capital Gains

With respect to capital gains, Trump prefers to keep the existing 0%/15%/20% brackets but align them with his threshold brackets on income. As with income tax, a block of taxpayers in the lower six-figure income range will see an increase in their capital gains taxes.

The House takes a different approach by aligning the capital gains and dividends brackets with the income tax brackets of 12%/25%/33% while allowing taxpayers to deduct 50% of their investment income as an above-the-line deduction. This deduction, combined with a 50% deduction of interest income, should result in an effectively lower capital gains tax rate for all.

Both Trump and the House propose that unincorporated business income be taxed at a lower flat rate, with Trump proposing 15% and the House proposing 25%. With such a huge differential between the 33% bracket and the 15% flat tax, there's great incentive for this income to be reclassified as "pass-through" business income instead of wages — essentially making us a nation of self-employed contractors. Stay tuned, as both approaches are short on details.

The Takeaway

Both plans are designed to lower taxes across the board, but there are winners and losers spread throughout the income brackets, and overall those with higher incomes look like clear winners. Both plans are also likely to produce huge deficits without significant growth; hopefully, the rosy predictions for tax-cut stimulus come true and prevent an explosion of federal debt. It seems unlikely, but if Donald J. Trump can be elected President, clearly nothing is beyond this great country of ours.

We can't predict what the final tax plan will look like, but we can make one prediction with certainty with respect to Trump and taxes: we will never see him release his personal tax returns. Never, never, never.

You can check your credit score and read your credit report for free within minutes using Credit Manager by MoneyTips.

Photo ©

  Conversation   |   5 Comments

Add a Comment

By submitting you agree to our Terms of Service
Zanna | 02.07.17 @ 20:19
Sounds like there are still a lot of benefits for the extremely wealthy, and not so many for those of us who can't consider donating $100,000 - 200,000 in deductions a year. It may be a different tax plan, but it's still not one that will help those of us who are struggling!
Erin | 02.07.17 @ 22:32
Once again, the wealthy are helped out substantially while the rest of the country is expected to pick up the slack. There is no simple solution on how to take care of the tax system, but these plans seem to just make it worse for those who are scraping by. Maybe someday our representatives will actually start working for us instead of themselves and their lobbyists.
Saving in WI | 02.08.17 @ 15:37
Those who are struggling usually don't pay taxes, they actually get money back. The wealthy actually pay most of the taxes. Rich people pay nearly 87% of all federal individual income tax in America
Chrisitna | 02.08.17 @ 16:54
It seems as though this plan is set up for the rich to get richer, and the poor to lose again. While it appears that I will personally benefit from Trump's proposed bracket changes, this will hurt the people who need breaks the most. Not a fan.
debbiej711 | 02.10.17 @ 21:00
I'm so sick of taxes. I'm so sick of people getting back thousands of dollars in taxes because they choose to stay under a certain income. These people are already getting Food Stamps, Free Medical Care, Free Lunches for their kids at school, then at the end of the year they get a big pay off of thousands of dollars in tax money. We pay for our food, pay for our medical for us and our kids, pay in taxes and get virtually nothing back. If you don't pay in and your are already getting government housing, food stamps, free medical care, and free lunches for your kids, then you don't deserve a tax refund at the end of the year. People making between $90,000 a year to $150,000 a year are constantly screwed by the tax laws and we are paying about 35% to 40% out of our checks weekly for Federal, State, FICA and Medicare. The government needs to change this.
$commenter.renderDisplayableName() | 12.04.20 @ 11:59